Advertisers paid $2.5 million for 30 second spots in the Super Bowl this year.
Smart advertisers made sure they did more than just buy the time by generating buzz before during and after the game via public relations and online strategies to stretch their investment.
Really smart advertisers in the future might consider this scenario: Budget enough money to buy four 30 second spots - say $10 million - but only buy one spot and donate the rest to a worthy cause. Then take your one 30 second spot and promote that cause. The company could start a campaign a week or ten days before the game promoting it through every avenue available to them and continue it right through the game and beyond.
Then imagine what a Super Bowl five years down the road might look like if it started a trend and think of all the good that could come of that approach. And imagine what the public would think of the companies who took this approach. And how it would make all the employees of those companies feel.
Who wants to start?
That's a cool idea! Maybe we should call up Budweiser or Sprint or any of those other knuckleheads that spent all that dough and pitch them your idea.
Posted by: Jeff Risley | Tuesday, February 07, 2006 at 05:06 PM
Thoughts like these make me want to make sure you know about Net Squared: Remixing the Web for Social Change http://netsquare.org
Posted by: Marshall Kirkpatrick | Thursday, February 09, 2006 at 12:57 AM
sorry, http://netsquared.org
Posted by: Marshall Kirkpatrick | Thursday, February 09, 2006 at 12:58 AM
Great idea! Would also love to see the beneficiaries of the charity in the next year's superbowl spot. That would show that the money was well spent - and COMPANIES can make a difference. Imagine how much that would incent others to make change.
Posted by: Jennifer Dlugozima | Thursday, February 09, 2006 at 09:10 AM